Text functions The utterancer's acceptability norm
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The research presents three models for text classification based on the
functional criterion. It aims to identify the criteria adopted in classifying
texts into forms, and define the concept of function, which was presented
in the first part of the article, based on the work of Jacobson, and then the
first attempts to classify texts in textual linguistics by Werlich, who tried
to present an integrated conception of a multidimensional classification,
in which this research focused on the dimension in which he relied on the
functional criterion based on the intentionality of the utterance.
Plum Analytics
Artifact Widget
Article Details
In accordance with its open access publishing policy, AL-Lisaniyyat acknowledges and guarantees authors the full and exclusive ownership of copyright and intellectual property rights related to their scholarly contributions.
The publication of an article in the journal does not result in any transfer, assignment, or limitation of these rights. Authors retain full rights over their works, without the requirement to obtain prior written authorization from the journal.
References
Adam, J.-M. (2015). La linguistique textuelle (3éme ed.). Armand Colin.
Arcand, R., & Bourbeau, N. (1998). La Communication Efficace—De L’intention Aux Moyens D’expression. De Boeck.
Burger, M., Lugrin, G., Micheli, R., & Pahud, S. (2006). Marques linguistiques et manipulation. Le cas d’une campagne de l’extrême droite suisse. Mots. Les langages du politique, 81, 9–22.
https://doi.org/10.4000/mots.609
Crystal, D. (2008). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (6th ed.). blackwell publishing.
Fludernik, M. (2000). Genres, Text Types, or Discourse Modes? Narrative Modalities and Generic Categorization. Style, 34 (2,), 274–292.
Grice, H. P. (1957). Meaning." The Philosophical Review 66: 377-88. 1969. Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions." The Philosophical Review, 78, 147–177.
Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. In Philosophy, language, and artificial intelligence (pp. 49–66). Springer.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics. In Style in language (pp. 350–377). MA: MIT Press.
Jakobson, R. (1971). Selected writings. 2. Word and language. Mouton de Gruyter.
Jakobson, R. (1997). The Dominant. In K. M. Newton, Twentieth-Century Literary Theory. Palgrave.
Kinneavy, J. L. (1971). A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse.
Kissine, M. (2013). From utterances to speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An Introduction (2nd ed.). blackwell publishing.
Searle, J. (1979). A taxonomy of illocutionary acts. Expression and Meaning.
Searle, J. R., & Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language (Vol. 626). Cambridge university press.
Strawson, P. F. (1964). Intention and Convention in Speech Acts. The Philosophical Review, 73 (4), 439–460.
https://doi.org/10.2307/2183301
Werlich, E. (1975). Typologie der Texte: Entwurf eines text linguistischen Modells zur Grundlegung einer Text grammatik. Quelle & Meyer.
Werlich, E. (1983). A Text Grammar of English (2nd ed.). Quelle & Meyer.