Forms of Reference to the Prophet Mohammed ﷺ by his Contemporaries; Their forms and pragmatic functions

Main Article Content

Muhammed Alhasan MUWAFFAK

Abstract

Within the framework of discourse analysis and sociolinguistics, forms of reference are one of the keys to understanding the relationships of influence and impact between language and society. The speaker's choice of one form of reference over another is not viewed as a mere random choice, but rather as a conscious and intentional preference imposed by the temporal, spatial, psychological, social, and cultural contexts surrounding the speech event. This study seeks to study the forms of reference to the Prophet Muhammad PBUH by those who lived in his era, as documented in the Ibn Hisham’s Prophet Biography, which represents a document for analyzing the language of discourse of that era. Study applied the descriptive analytical method to the forms of reference to the Prophet PBUH, it classified their types, then studied them in the light of pragmatics. Study showed multiple forms used to refer to the Prophet PBUH; such as the first name, the full name, the nickname, and the adjective. It showed that the speaker's preference for the type of Forms of Reference is linked - in most cases - to the pragmatic function that he seeks to load for this formula or that.

Plum Analytics

Artifact Widget

Article Details

How to Cite
MUWAFFAK , M. A. (2026). Forms of Reference to the Prophet Mohammed ﷺ by his Contemporaries; Their forms and pragmatic functions. AL-Lisaniyyat, 32(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.61850/allj.v32i1.792
Section
Articles

References

الحسن، محمد موفق (2024). ملامح المقاربات التداولية عند علماء التفسير في توجيه دلالة صيغ مخاطبة البشر للبشر في القرآن الكريم. مجلة دراسات
الجامعة الأردنية. 51(1): 515-526. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i1.1637
• هارون، عبد السلام (1985). تهذيب سيرة ابن هشام. مؤسسة الرسالة.
• سولونج، و. م؛ يوب، س. (2012). السياق المقامي وأهميته في تفسير صيغ المخاطبة في الخطاب النبوي. مجلة مجمع اللغة العربية الأردني، 36(32)،
145–178.
• Braun, F. (1988). Terms of address: Problems of patterns and usage in various languages and cultures. Mouton de
Gruyter.
• Cecconi, E. (2008). Legal discourse and linguistic incongruities in Bardell vs. Pickwick. Language and Literature, 17(3),
206.
• Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University
Press.
Romanized References
• Al-Ḥasan, Muḥammad Muwaffaq. (2024). Malāmiḥ al-muqārabāt al-tadāwuliyya ʿinda ʿulamāʾ al-
tafsīr fī tawjīh dalālat ṣīgh mukhāṭabat al-bashar li-l-bashar fī al-Qurʾān al-karīm. Majallat Dirāsāt
al-Jāmiʿa al-Urduniyya, 51(1), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v51i1.1637
• Hārūn, ʿAbd al-Salām. (1985). Tahdhīb Sīrat Ibn Hishām. Muʾassasat al-Risāla.
• Sūlūnj, W. M., & Yūb, S. (2012). Al-siyāq al-maqāmī wa-ahammiyyatuhu fī tafsīr ṣīgh al-mukhāṭaba fī
al-khiṭāb al-nabawī. Majallat Majmaʿ al-Lugha al-ʿArabiyya al-Urdunī, 36(32), 145–178